In defense of stuff
Go crazy, buy your kid 37 dolls
If you’ve been enjoying The Argument and would like to share it with friends and family for the holidays, you’re in luck! You can save 15% now through Dec. 24 when you gift a subscription to The Argument using the link below.
And for those of you looking for something more tangible, we’ve also got merch — our hats and “Libbing Out!” stickers are now online.
Consumption gets a bad rap, but it was still unusual to hear the president of the United States concede that not only was his signature economic policy going to increase prices, but that was perhaps a good thing because it would reduce overconsumption: “All I’m saying is that a young lady, a 10-year-old girl, 9-year-old girl, 15-year-old girl, doesn’t need 37 dolls.”
Putting aside the disturbing choice to refer to 9-year-olds as young ladies, I’ve been mulling Trump’s anti-overconsumption take as I do my own holiday shopping. Because it’s not just Trump. The idea that Americans’ consumption habits are disgusting or over-the-top is the conventional wisdom that has spurred a thousand takes.
And while I think wastefulness is bad, comments about overconsumption have always rubbed me the wrong way. First, because most consumption is great and all better worlds feature dramatically more consumption than we have right now, not less. And second, because elite complaints about overconsumption are usually about mocking what other people spend their money on.
Don’t let anti-consumerism fool you, consumption is the root of (nearly) all good things
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Argument to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.



