Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deadpan Troglodytes's avatar

I think this argument could be correct, but the article relies too heavily on taking polling results at face value.

For example, this poll includes a prominent warning that social desirability bias may have influenced results. The finding "Male Trump voters prioritize family but don't think others do the same" was deduced from the questions: "If you had to choose, which is more important to you personally? And which do you think is more important to the majority of American men?" The response split requires more scrutiny, imo.

If you agree that there's social pressure to say you prioritize family (across the political spectrum, for different reasons), I think you have to consider that some unknowable share of respondents used the second question as a safety valve, as an opportunity to hedge their first answer or express a view they weren't comfortable stating directly.

There are other problems, too: the questions are underspecified and people lie to themselves. As I read the article, "Breaking Bad" kept invading my thoughts, Bryan Cranston snarling "I'm doing this for my family" to justify acts of mayhem, or more pointedly, his absence from his family.

Polling is valuable, but rarely tells a simple story.

KP's avatar

I recently had several weeks on disability leave from work after major surgery. I didn't worry for a second about missing anything important at work. I agonized constantly that I wasn't able to be a good father because I couldn't pick up my daughter due to lifting restrictions. It was very clarifying in demonstrating to myself what I valued.

21 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?